Counter to accepted scholarship, it is only by adopting Nietzsche's dialectic that we can ever invert traditional thinking on this issue . The author encourages us to re-interpret the Zoroastrian creation myth . Distinguishing the deliberate eternal hubris of this Christology from its instantiation in this form, the search for a practical ethic tangentially influenced by traditional thinking on this issue is, for Spengler , the ultimate in metatextual morbidity . Without doing violence to its essential structure, there is a very real sense in which the desire to create a practical ethic which is Sisyphean in its hubris is, for Spengler , the ultimate in Sisyphean bold futility .

---

Rachael/ArtsEssayGenerator