Counter to accepted scholarship, bearing in mind the unity with which we can demonstrate that this is delightfully Oedipal , with a hermeneutic which is heretical in its deliberate hubris , the juxtaposition of contemporary feminist thought with the author's unfulfilling marriage is a narrative device without which the hermeneutic proposed by Nietzsche will not stand. Without doing violence to its essential structure, there is a very real sense in which the author compels us to invert the plurality with which the text attempts to undercut the author's unfulfilling marriage . Tempting though it may be to subvert the role of the author , the juxtaposition of the apparent absence of a metanarrative with the Zoroastrian creation myth is a refinement of the theory without which the Christology proposed by Spengler will not stand.

---

Rachael/ArtsEssayGenerator