Counter to accepted scholarship, the pursuit of a Christology which is Mephistophelean in its quixotic defiance of the Zoroastrian creation myth is, for Spengler , an exercise in deliberate futility . With a Christology unconnected with the apparent absence of a metanarrative , the text invites us to demonstrate that this is tantalisingly Oedipal in its metatextual eternal reinterpretation of the post-structuralist crisis . Without doing violence to its essential structure, with a practical ethic which is unashamedly heretical in its eternal quixotic defiance of the post-structuralist crisis , there is a very real sense in which the uneasy comparison of the apparent absence of a metanarrative with the rise of Western capitalism is a narrative device without which the practical ethic proposed by Rousseau will not stand.

---

Rachael/ArtsEssayGenerator