It should be noted that it's a bit of a waste to just include links to ToothyWiki pages. For example, the above MoshkowLibrary wiki page doesn't actually have a url for the aforementioned library. - CorkScrew
So go fix it! I say we definitely do want to link to the wiki page rather than the external site where one exists. Better still, make CategoryOpenInfo? and a page for each resource. If something's worth mentioning, it's worth describing. - MoonShadow
I think it would be unnecessary reification to create a page for each and every resource, especially when that page would have no more information than I've been placing after each link. Why force people to click two links rather than one? Currently I think the best bet is to link to a wiki page if it exists but to always link to the actual resource. - CorkScrew
I want to avoid the situation where someone finds this page, wants to write about one of the resources on it, doesn't realise there's already a page about the resource and makes a duplicate. The simplest - and most wiki - way seems to be to link to the existing page where possible. And you're right, I guess there isn't a conflict between that and giving the external link here as well. - MoonShadow
I'm also vaguely failing to see the usefulness of Yet Another List Of Links given Google exists, but am willing to be proved wrong by someone actually finding it useful. - MoonShadow
I've already found it useful. I don't think I'd really come across infidels.org. Now I look forward to spending many a happy half hour there. - CorkScrew