[Home]Go/PlayingNotes1

ec2-3-133-111-85.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com | ToothyWiki | Go | RecentChanges | Login | Webcomic

AlexChurchill & Kazuhiko (Black) vs MoonShadow (White)


Game commenced: A very long time ago
Game concluded: A long time ago
Result: Black surrendered





.............
........xo...
..o.....xoo..
...+..+.oxo..
.x.....x.x...
.............
...+..+..+...
.............
..ox..o......
..ox..+..+...
..x.......x..
.............
.............















Bleh indeed. I was hoping black would go a, starting a ladder that would have terminated around b in favour of white. As it is, I suspect that white shall have to play at a, since c will result in a ladder that terminates around d in favour of black. I'll think on this for a while, I think.. - MoonShadow.

I read that one, fortunately for me.  I'm still worried about the fate of the group at 1 though. -- Kazuhiko



......x......
....xooxxo...
..o..xooxoo..
...+.oxooxo..
.x.....x.x...
.............
...+..+..+...
.............
..ox..o......
..ox..+..+...
..x.......x..
.............
.............















Well, I've effectively declared the upper right black group dead, if white wishes to remove it.  The way I read the ladder would lead to a breakout frustratingly near the end.  One which I would have been able to stop if the other end was blocked.  Any thoughts? -- Kazuhiko

MoonShadow: I was hoping that would be the case when I played White's last two moves. It should still be dead after this move:


......x.o....
...ox.oxxo...
..o..xooxoo..
...+..xooxo..
.x.....x.x...
.............
...+..+..+...
.............
..ox..o......
..ox..+..+...
..x.......x..
.............
.............
  (I think there's lots of similar plays. Black could do a  instead of 5, white could try going for b, c  then one of the ds instead of 4..)














[Discussion] of [this] position:

AlexChurchill thinks black can still stop white getting two eyes at bottom-left, but has to be careful.  Stone 1 below is vulnerable to white (a), and probably needs defending, maybe by playing (a) or (b).  I think white needs to get both (c)s to get two eyes, and a white play at either one can be responded to by a black at the other.  And with a black stone at either (a) or (b), I think such an attack is safe for black.  I think I'll leave it to Kazuhiko to choose which, although I might find myself joining the black team soon anyway :)


.............
...ox...xo...
..o....oxoo..
...+..xooxo..
.x.....x.x...
.............
...+..+..+...
..x..........
.xox..o......
.oox..+..+...
.ox.......x..
.ox..........
.............















Let's try that out...


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxo.+..
.oxoo....
.oxxx....
.o.......









...what now?

Angoel: I think that black would be better off playing 3 on 7.  If white plays at 3, then black can play at b, stopping white getting two eyes.

Suppose black has played 3 as above, though...

AlexChurchill: I think I'd play the (9) marked above, rather than the one you suggested (a).  That seems to me to make the black defense-of-the-corner safer.  Altho I've no idea whether the black stones connected to 5 and 7 are in fact going to live.  It's white to play next in the diagram above... care to continue? :)

MoonShadow: If they don't live, black has failed to get rid of the white group. Which is what I'm hoping for.

(AlexChurchill moves (1) below)

MoonShadow: Permit me to speculate ahead..


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxo.+..
.oxoo.o..
.oxxxo...
.o..xxo..


  Black to play next (I think that kills it; if black doesn't do 3, white plays there instead)





AlexChurchill: You're right.  I was hoping white would move 3 or a, in which case black lives.  I concluded, as you did, that black dies on white 2.  But what happens if...


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxo.+..
.oxoox...
.oxxxox..
.o..oxo..


  4 captures the piece at 1... does white now play 6 where 1 was?   I think black 7 at (a) would kill the white stones then...





Hmm - I think we're getting confused by notation for captures.
D'oh! Yes, you're quite right.


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxo.+..
.oxoox...
.oxxxox..
.o..o.o..









What does white do now?  I argued above that playing (a) loses the white stones to a black response at (b).  You seem to be suggesting instead white plays at one of the (c)s, but then black plays (a) and his black stones have a liberty, which black can then fill in to connect to the outside world... -- AlexChurchill


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxo.+..
.oxoox...
.oxxxxx..
.ooooxo..



  ...something like this? Black is forced to play (4),   otherwise white would play there to capture (2).



AlexChurchill: Yes, something like that.  White gets a free move, maybe one of the (a)s if feeling aggressive; but as long as Black can now save the large group featuring (4), White's stones in the corner are dead...




Also,


...+..+..
.xxx.....
.xox..o..
xooxoo+..
.oxooxx..
.oxxxox..
.o.ooox..


  White isn't fast enough there - (a) kills it. Can white do something better in response to (2)?








Discussion grabbed on 2/12/02:



Current thoughts:


.............
...ox...xo...
..o....oxoo..
...+..xooxo..
.x.....x.x...
..o..ox......
..xooxxo.+...
x.xoxxo......
.xoxxoo......
.ooxoox..+...
.oxoox....x..
.oxxx........
.............















Then,


.x.....x.x...
.ooxxox......
xox..xxo.+...
xox.xxo......
.xoxxoo......
.ooxoox..+...


(black (3) takes white group at (a); white then lives in corner)




or


.x.....x.x...
..o.xox......
..xooxxo.+...
x.xoxxo......
.xoxxoo......
.ooxoox..+...
.oxooxo...x..
.oxxx........
.............


(white surrenders same group as last time to live in bottom middle.  Is there a way for white to play at (a) and still live in the bottom  left corner, though?)





Actually, I was expecting you to immediately attack at 2 (or nearby).  Unfortunately, I can't defend as long as you are laddering my centre group. - Kazuhiko

MoonShadow: I can't carry on doing that for very much longer..


MoonShadow's thoughts on [this] position:

.xoxxoooxx...
.ooxooxxoox..
.oxoooox.ox..
.oxxxoxxxox..
....o.oooox..







..a is suicide, b is pointless (leads to ..6). What now?

AlexChurchill responds by playing elsewhere, trying to ignore the problem in the hope it'll go away :)  I know that group was dead if you played right, from about revision 119 onwards...


At [Revision 142], AlexChurchill thinks the bottom-right corner is safe for black now. The below are a couple of explorations of different White (2)s, which I think are fine for Black. White did of course go on to attack, with (2) and (3) as in the lower example, but diverging from then on...

........
...xo...
..oxoo..
.xooxoo.
xo.oxxoo
.xox..xx
xxo.xxo.
xooox.x.
oooxx.o.
oxxooxx.
oox.oxo.
oxxxox..
.ooo....















........
...xo...
..oxoo..
.xooxoo.
xo.oxxoo
.xox..xx
xxo.xxo.
xooox.o.
oooxx.xo
oxxoox.x
oox.ox..
oxxxox..
.ooo....

ec2-3-133-111-85.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com | ToothyWiki | Go | RecentChanges | Login | Webcomic
This page is read-only | View other revisions | Recently used referrers
Last edited May 19, 2003 10:24 pm (viewing revision 1, which is the newest) (diff)
Search: